(Approx 2 minute read)

Most people look at kata and see “blocking”. It’s the word everyone recognizes, drilled into beginners from day one. But kata teach far more than simply stopping a strike. A more accurate term is “receiving”.
.
So what does it mean to receive rather than block?
.
It’s common for less experienced practitioners to view blocking as: “I wait, the attack comes, I meet it.” It feels passive, the focus is on defense, not on controlling the situation.
.
Receiving, in contrast, emphasizes control, timing, and intent. You don’t just stop the attack; you intercept, redirect, move yourself, move the opponent, create openings, and often strike in the same movement. It’s active, strategic, and initiative-driven.
.
Blocking can be passive if misunderstood. But even a well-executed block is already a form of receiving.
.
The problem is perception: many see “block” and imagine waiting to be hit, while “receiving” forces the practitioner to think about interaction, control, and timing.
.
Receiving is about managing the situation and using the opponent’s force to your advantage.
.
Another term often thrown around is “timing”. But this isn’t just reacting quickly, it’s knowing when to move, intercept, or exploit an opening. It’s the subtle gap between an opponent’s intent and action.
.
That gap is the difference between safely meeting force, redirecting it, or striking decisively first.
.
I believe kata were never designed to contain everything. If you think about it, how could they? They’d be far too long. They are not an instruction manual. They should be viewed as templates, guides for principle, not encyclopedias of combat.
.
Students of the time already learned the subtleties of distance, initiative, and timing through two-person drills. And with regard to preemption, which I wrote about recently, showing explicit preemptive action in solo kata wasn’t necessary, it was understood in context, training, and tactical awareness..
.
Okinawan teachers emphasize that kata were built around “receiving first”. But I don’t believe they were teaching passive waiting.
.
They were teaching how to control conflict: meeting force, redirecting it, or moving strategically before the opponent completes their action.
.
And doing this well is a way to seize initiative, not surrender it. Kata provides the patterns and angles, the movements and lines, but timing and decision-making come from experience and practice.
.
Does history and practice show this approach works? I believe it does. Teachers like Motobu Choki were pragmatic: in his view, when conflict is unavoidable, initiative should be taken. If waiting to receive put you at risk, acting first was common sense.
.
Ultimately, kata are both the map and the mnemonic. They show the path and the principles, but practice and experience teach you how to navigate the terrain: when to wait, when to move, and when to act first.
.
Even if some tradition suggests otherwise, tradition, like a block, should never be static. To me, that is the practical lesson kata are meant to teach us.
.
.
Written by Adam Carter – Shuri Dojo